Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Famous Runescape Players

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per CSD:A7, a whole rake of nn-bios. Stifle (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Famous Runescape Players

A very good article, yes, but is this needed? Just because a few people are famous on a game does that mean they deserve a Joint article? J.J.Sagnella(Happy first wiki-anniversary to me) 15:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

• I'm not sure about AFD. Would you like to try WP:PROD? This article has been recently created and has not been vandalised...yet. Anyway, I vote DELETE.--Ed^{I'm lonely, talk to me} _contribs 15:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Because when we do AFDs it means speedy repost deletions are possible and rogue subpages like this for runescape crop up a lot. J.J.Sagnella(Happy first wiki-anniversary to me) 18:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as unverifiable and/or irrelevant. It's easy enough to check the high-scores for players like Zezima and N0valyfe, but most of the others will not pass WP:V. QuagmireDog 16:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete every single one of these would be an easy A7 speedy if they were individual articles, and making them one big article doesn't make them any more encyclopedic. Delete per WP:NOT, {{WP:BIO]], and strong existing precedent not to have articles for MMORPG players. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Let's have a "Famous HALO players" ! AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites)  17:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment can't this be speedy deleted per A7 as mentioned by QuagmireDog?--Ed^{I'm lonely, talk to me} _contribs 17:28, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, gamers are not notable without independent news coverage, just like anyone else. NawlinWiki 17:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, subjective gamecruft. Deizio talk 18:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.