Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/False/Fabled Super Saiyan forms
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion | False
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] False/Fabled Super Saiyan forms
This page should be deleted because of WP:NOR, oh and WP:RS as well. Whispering(talk/c) 16:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- TheFarix (Talk) 19:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Speculative fan analysis and original research. No sources cited --TheFarix (Talk) 19:15, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete It's a speculative article. Statements like this aren't too comforting either:
- No known web site has reliable information on the image's origin (as it is a work by an unknown fan who has not come forward to claim it), thus the copyright information below is the best that can be managed.
- This basically admits the article/rumour is based on an anonymous drawing. --Wafulz 00:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Deleteper nom. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete (NB: I know nothing about DB) Article is about "false-" or "fabled forms" which by their nature makes the article tend to OR or NN. First false/fabled form is stated to be a "lable"[sic] used by "some fans" and doesn't provide sources. Second section again cites "some fans" without reference then goes on to state "it is not a new Super Saiyan form" anyway. For the third section see Wafulz above. Shiroi Hane 15:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and cry soft tears of desperation. Pascal.Tesson 17:56, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
