Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FEATS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. This should probably be renominated in due time if it isn't cleaned up anytime soon. ~ trialsanderrors 07:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] FEATS
Page created by self-professed organizer of the event. Numerous POV/advert/style problems resulting from autobio nature of the article. Limited notability (under 1000 Ghits for the festival name and all sponsoring groups or self-references). ju66l3r 23:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete NN theatrical event --Steve (Slf67) talk 00:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep I am unconvined about them being not notable. There are a lot of Google hits, inclusing at least this one article, and I did not expend much effort so there may be more. I'll agree that the article reads like an advertisement, which means it should be copy-editted, not deleted. -- Whpq 14:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and clean up. While I couldn't find the magic link that clearly established the notabilty of this event (the most interesting article I found was here), the overall coverage was enough to convince me of just sufficient notability. What impressed me was that there was coverage on British, German, Belgian and Luxemburgian (?) sites. It's close, but I think there's enough to merit keeping the article. -Kubigula (ave) 23:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and clean up, per Kubigula. The town of Ghent (in Dutch, unfortunately, [1] advertises the local theatrical group "De Waanzin" (meaning "Lunacy") by mentioning that they won FEATS twice. Notability should not therefore be an issue at all, self-promotion, however, is a different matter.--Pan Gerwazy 10:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
