Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eye4you

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete CSD G7, author's request. Kimchi.sg 08:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eye4you

Notability in question. Possible advert. --NMChico24 04:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete only claim to notability is distributing software written by someone else. --Pboyd04 04:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Spam. Creator's contributions speak for themselves [1]--IslaySolomon 04:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. TheRingess 04:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete all corporate spam. SM247^{My Talk} 04:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Main author of this page (Nathan.manzi) concedes main purpose was advertisement. HumbleGod 06:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Small 4-5 man shop that would appear to only be re-distributing software (correct me if I mis-read that). Article is written by employee, so WP:VANITY conflict of interest problems. Media reviews are mainly for the re-distributed software, with scant mention of the company - with one fairly strong exception [2], so I can't see any claims to WP:CORP.Kuru ^talk 05:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. Kuru ^talk 05:08, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete Conflict of interest, however, article intended to inform rather than advertise. Nathan.manzi 05:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator.--Tdxiang 07:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:CORP and WP:VAIN. Technically, the author voted to delete - does this get a G7 for that? --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 07:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.