Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Every Show Sucks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Every Show Sucks

Every Show Sucks (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links)

This article is about a streaming service that, according to the article, had several hundred subscribers and streams; it would appear that its main claim to fame was being shut down by the MPAA back in July. I provided links to the guidelines for reliable sources, WP:WEB (which I think is the closest to it, though WP:CORP would be close too), for the editor to work with, but only one potential source came forward. The editor said on the talk page he didn't feel it would meet the guidelines; I'm bringing it here for discussion. Delete Tony Fox (arf!) 01:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Per nom. --Don't mess with Scott. 02:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:V. A google search for "Every Show Sucks" TV gets 35 unique hits, almost all are blogs. —Mitaphane _talk 02:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete it's fine it doesn't belong here --Mckeznak 03:25, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom †he Bread 03:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per article's main contributor acknowledging that it doesn't meet WP:WEB. Wavy G 04:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominationXeinart 05:43, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable website, the lack of Google hits explains its lack of notability outside its own website or some ads and Wikipedia with its mirrors. Doesn't need an article here. --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 10:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete if its really that much of a problem, then go ahead and delete it. However, this service survived for YEARS because it was descreet. Hense the lack of resources. At the time of its closure it had hundreds of subscribers but well over 35,000 registered users, it was more than just a little thing famous for being closed down. With TV moving ever more twords internet streaming it important that ESS be noted as the first HIGH QUALITY streaming network, even if in the end it was not to be. --pongluver 10:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nomination. Xdenizen 21:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.