Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esto Perpetua Award

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Esto perpetua. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 16:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Esto Perpetua Award

Esto Perpetua Award (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete - there do not appear to be multiple independent non-trivial references to establish notability. Otto4711 23:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletions. -- Tikiwont 12:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman 00:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

• Merge into Esto perpetua. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 00:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep it comes up over 200 times on google Ulysses Zagreb 09:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

• Counting raw numbers of Google hits is not a proper method of determining notability. The majority of those hits are either from sources affiliated with the state of Idaho (and thus are not sources independent of the subject) or are trivial mentions in articles on other topics. The award itself is not the subject of multiple independent reliable sources. Otto4711 13:53, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

• Merge or Delete per nom. That's 55 unique G-hits. Just FYI, Ulysses, by our standards, 200 Google hits is pretty pathetic. If it was twenty thousand hits, that would be more significant. RGTraynor 19:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.