Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esprit Holidays

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-27 06:12Z

[edit] Esprit Holidays

Esprit Holidays (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Reads like an advert. I don't reckon the company isn't that big or notable in my eyes Botley Crew 14:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Delete - notability is asserted (claiming they're the largest ski package provider in Britain) but not demonstrated; no references or links to third-party independent sources to demonstrate notability per WP:CORP. Delete unless further sources are added by end of this AfD. Walton monarchist89 14:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• OK, you can Delete this - This was one of my first page creations. I went on a (reasonable) holiday with this company, and thought I'd write an article about them. Didn't know anything about the Notability guidelines then. I'm still not that clued-up on it. --Montchav 16:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • In that case, speedy delete CSD G7 (author requests deletion). Please tag accordingly (I can't do so as I'm not the author). Walton monarchist89 09:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Ah yeah, this crazy CSD G7 clause. Does that mean that any page I've made I can get speedy deleted? --Montchav 07:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.