Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric I. Spoutz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 17:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eric I. Spoutz

Article about an art dealer, created by User:slaenterprises--same name as the subject's published e-mail address [1]. The claims of notability made in the article are uncited, and I cannot find anything verifiable to back them up. Most Google hits are of the type where you submit your own press release/information. I'm open to changing my mind on this if someone can prove me wrong, but for now, I say delete this article as there is nothing verifiable to show that the subject is notable. ScottW 04:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I love this claim: "Mr. Spoutz is the youngest individual to achieve large success as an Art Dealer and Collector in the begining of the 21st cetury." Def. needs sourcing to remain. Also, this sheet has been tagged for sources and cleanups for quite awhile now. (off and on) Lsjzl 04:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• cut down and clean up Joeyramoney 04:56, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I have also tagged the editor's other contribution, Ian Hornak, for needing footnotes and citations. Tychocat 10:02, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless sourced and cleaned up. --Xyrael ^T 12:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom.- Motor (talk) 13:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam. Wile E. Heresiarch 16:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam. —Khoikhoi 03:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The article has been modified and sources have been cited.
• Weak Delete after reviewing the cited sources, I think that the gallery may be marginally notable but Mr. Spoutz is not apart from it. If the article was rewritten and renamed to focus on the gallery I would probably change to a weak keep. Eluchil404 01:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.