Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envision

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was ambiguous.

The original version was a dictionary definition which had already been transwiki'd. According to the rules at meta:transwiki, it was immediately eligible for deletion at that time. The article was subsequently rewritten into a disambiguation page for various organizations using the name "Envision". I note, however, that none of the listed entities has a Wikipedia article yet. Looking at the referenced sites, it is not obvious that they ever will get articles. Disambiguation pages are for the disambiguation of existing articles. Using them as a back door to requesting an article is discouraged.

I am going to exercise my discretion and call this one as a "delete" but without prejudice against re-creation if/when articles about two or more of these organizations are written.

Having said that I am calling this a "delete", I further note that the community concensus after transwiki's is shifting from deletion to the use of the new {{wi}} template. In deference to that emerging concensus, I am going to modify my decision. Rossami (talk) 9 July 2005 04:21 (UTC)

[edit] Envision

Dicdef. Delete. DS1953 22:26, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Dicdef Gblaz 23:27, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef.-Splash 23:32, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Rewritten article to yield an encyclopaedia article about things rather than a dictionary article (that appeared to have been copied from the advertising blurb for the video player software, moreover) about a word. Uncle G June 28, 2005 11:50 (UTC)
• Rewrite article Please rewrite articles you find questionable is possible. Nytannon
• Rewrite article Uncle G has done some good work here. Needs a little formatting, but now encyclopedic as a disambig page. func(talk) 8 July 2005 01:34 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.