Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EnterpriseDB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was Copyvio. The copyrighted text is still in this article. Deathphoenix ʕ 16:52, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

The result of the nomination was Keep, after I removed the copyvio content. --Deathphoenix ʕ 16:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] EnterpriseDB

Spam for a software package. Text is mostly copyvio from [1]. Staecker 12:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Keep and cleanup if necessary 788,000 Google hits as well as 17 Google news hits is a pretty strong indicator that this is indeed a noteworthy product. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Please use your discretion, but Andrew Lenahan's comments should be considered. I do not have any issues whatever be the decision. Nikkhils
• Keep, but the promotional language needs to be replaced with balanced presentation, objective third-party reviews, etc. Tom Harrison ^Talk 14:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete there are 563 distinct hits. I am familiar with quite a few Open Source and database products and had never heard of this one. Various claims need substatiation from a source other than their own website and anon wiki editors. Dlyons493 Talk 22:32, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Someone seems to have already down-toned the contents. Dlyons493, this one is a new kid on the block. Infact the PostgresQL page on Wikipedia, already points to the enterprisedb webpage.Nikkhils

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.