Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enlarge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete the content, make a new redirect to Enlargement. - Bobet 16:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Enlarge

Came across this page while clearing out stubs, seems to me that this page is inherently dicdef and cannot be anything more. What is here now seems to be a unique mix of dicdef and POV pushing Deville (Talk) 06:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom - what a confused article though. I guess if someone knew what it was about and cared .... but otherwise def del Nigel ^(Talk) 12:39, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• This is just spillover from the disagreement that surrounds The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, specifically History of the "Protocols of Zion" (AfD discussion), not an encyclopaedia article on the subjects of enlargement or expansion of books. There is nothing worth retaining here. Per our Wikipedia:Naming conventions (verbs), redirect to enlargement. Uncle G 13:29, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.