Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineering Softwares

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 13:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Engineering Softwares

Delete. Both prod and wikify tags were removed. Looking past the formatting, a list of Oil and Gas Software products is not encyclopedic (maybe this would be better served as a category?) The title is inappropriate for the subject matter and the content seems unsalvagable.lowercase 17:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page because it contains the same content:

• Process Engineering Simulation Softwares

lowercase 17:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi there ! My second article "Process Engineering Simulation Software" is not listing Oil and Gas Products but in fact is listing the simulation software used in designing these equipment that produce the Hydrocarbons. I am new to Wikipedia and would appreciate your suggestions to improve the article and its inclusion in the database. Thanks, -Andy

• Delete and then create category. Although I can't see how any of those pieces of software would merit articles. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 18:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete An article about the way a particular simulation works might be interesting, but a list isn't. Also, 'software' is an uncountable noun - it takes no 's'. --Jamoche 19:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

How do I create a category? Thanks. -Andy

• Delete list of names w/o any info doesn't belong to encyclopedia. Pavel Vozenilek 19:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. There is insufficient context to understand what the various programs are for. Also, the Official Policy WP:NOR points out that when there are few or no citations in an article, the editor who contributed it probably did original research, which is not acceptable. While programs are named, there is insufficient information to locate any further information about the programs. Gerry Ashton 23:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.