Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy vortex (stargate)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Stargate (device). -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:16, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Energy vortex (stargate)

A very rarely used or spoken-of term for the "kawoosh" which is covered plentifully in many many other Stargate articles, particularly Stargate (device)  Alfakim --  talk  05:21, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Uncyclopedic at best.--Vercalos 05:23, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I just want to say that Stargate is very encyclopedic. We have a whole portal for it. It's one of the top 100 shows on TV. In fact, sevral Stargate articles may become FAs soon and Stargate SG-1 is on the good articles list. The whole reason this is up for deletion is because it's a nickname for something we already have. Tobyk777 07:10, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge into a term list if notable. Deckiller 05:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Stargate (device) This is notable. It's just an alternate name for part of the stargate's function, which we already have a massive article about. Tobyk777 07:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • It would be worth a redirect if any other page actually linked to it; but none do. -- Alfakim --  talk  07:54, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Stargate (device) per previous reasoning on AfD for Chevron (Stargate); SG-1 is notable; Stargates are a notable thing in SG-1 and sufficiently notable; components of stargates or features of the way they work, aren't sufficiently notable to go to a third tier. Georgewilliamherbert 08:02, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Stargate (device) per above. -- Saberwyn 10:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • No need to merge, the kawoosh is already well covered in the Gate article. -- Saberwyn 23:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above... some more. Melchoir 04:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. -- Alpha269 16:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. Dan, the CowMan 03:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.