Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Rauschenbach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 10:42, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Emma Rauschenbach

Article gives no assertion of notability other than simply "being the wife of". Aecis 20:32, 22 October 2005 (UTC) After MacRusgail's excellent additions to this article, I change my vote to keep. If it is possible, I would like to withdraw the nomination. Aecis 21:10, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Keep - Would consider her to be extremely notable, particularly in the development of some of Jung's theories. This article should definitely be expanded (I'll have a go), as she did not play a peripheral role in my view. She was also a noted psychologist in her own right, and expert on the Grail legend.--MacRusgail 20:49, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Flapdragon 20:54, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment - I have a copy of Jung's autobiography somewhere and will scout this out to see if any further info can be added. It would be nice to see her in an independent light, but I do wonder whether the article should be called "Emma Jung" or not. --MacRusgail 21:24, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Dlyons493 Talk 21:30, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but move to Emma Jung. I've read that Grail book! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:35, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep MacRusgail's excellent rewrite establishing her notability and move to Emma Jung. Capitalistroadster 00:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.