Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Schwartz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. No mention of critical acclaim or awards for plays and productions sufficient to warrant notability. Wikipedia isn't a bank for notability earning interest over time, it is a record of the process of achieving notability or a description of a notable subsstance, artifact, process, achievement, etc. Awards, prizes, critical notices, etc are required to demonstrate notability for actors/playwrights and none are in evidence here. (aeropagitica) 22:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Emily Schwartz

non-notable actress, miserably fails the google test by getting only 62 hits when the search criterion was "Emily Schwartz" actress. I vote delete. Deyyaz ^{[ Talk | Contribs ]} 17:03, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:BIO. Non-notable. --Nishkid64 20:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Runch 21:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep It should be noted that there are 169 hits for a google search of "Emily Scwartz" playwright. (What's the threshold of hits for notability?) I also am unable to determine the original author of the entry. If it's Ms. Schwartz, then I vote Delete. MichaelCaricofe 03:54, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I added this article. I have no idea if Ms. Schwartz even approves of the article or not, since she has never responded to my e-mail, though I have met her briefly on two occasions. If she were the author of the entry, I don't she would have put "c. 1980" for year of birth, which I put only because I knew her age but not her birthdate. Of all the local playwrights that have had their work put on in Indianapolis, she is the only one I know of to be dubbed a "local genius" by the alternative press, and I concur with that monicker. 169 hits is quite a lot for someone to be tagged "non-notable" and I think we'll hear more form her in the future. --Scottandrewhutchins 04:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• DeleteThis actress/playwright is non-notable under every measure. Mutually reinforcing Google hits merely indicate that someone is ubiquitious, rather than notable.ArkansasRed 16:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete A non-notable - at least at this stage in her career. Scottandrewhutchins may be right: we may hear more from her in future, but this is purely crystal ball. Victoriagirl 00:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete if anything, the Google results highlight the her lack of notability. She will be welcome to an article when she becomes notable. Tewfik^Talk 19:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.