Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elle.eye.am

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Bobet 21:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Elle.eye.am

Fails WP:BAND. Two google hits, no presence on website for claimed label. Dhartung | Talk 19:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Not listed on claimed label website. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Do not delete The label, Fingerprint Records, is an independant recording label located in Port Perry, On. The label does not advertise itself via internet. As the purpose of Wikipedia is to act as a provider of information, the entry with regards to Elle.eye.am provides such information regardless of the inability to access label information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.187.40.6 (talk • contribs) .

That's fascinating, but information on Wikipedia must be verifiable and cited to reliable sources. A band nobody's ever heard of, on a label nobody's ever heard of, is not information that is appropriate for Wikipedia. Please read the criteria for inclusion of musical groups. --Dhartung | Talk 22:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Do not Delete If we use the argument that just because nobody has ever heard of either the artist or label does not make it inappropriate. There are thousands of entries of information on Wikipedia that many have not heard of that is still considered appropriate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.114.143.87 (talk • contribs) .
• Do not Delete Satisfies relevant information 12:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by C b4 (talk • contribs) .
• Delete per nom. Richmeister 14:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Does not satisfy notability criteria. Delete. DJ Clayworth 17:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Do not delete satisfies relevant information and was found on claimed sites —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.114.143.87 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment How, exactly, does it "satisfy relevant criteria", and what websites was it found on? --Richmeister 13:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.