Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleven international publishing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep by unambiguous and unanimous community decision. Also, I will move article for sake of capitalization of title. -- Psy guy ^(talk) 18:17, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Eleven international publishing

Hmm. Well, they do genuinely exist, but you'd think an internationally-known publisher of academic textbooks and such would have more than ~90 Google hits, wouldn't you? DS 14:21, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep noteworthy publisher of academic texts. I've seen numerous notable items fail Google tests and this seems to be one such cases. Google is not the end all to establish whether we should have an article on something. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:59, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep the article. I am an author and editor at eleven myself having an experience of roundabout 30 years in editing and publishing with various distinguished international publishing houses. But I never worked with a publisher which offered such a good professional support and service to their authors and editors like eleven. Therefore I think that information about eleven should be made available to a broad public via Wikipedia. M.Benkö http://www.uni-koeln.de/jur-fak/instluft/index-e.html

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.