Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Redirect — 3 votes for redirect to electricity, 2 votes delete, 1 vote keep --Gareth Hughes 15:21, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Electrism
neologism Salsb 01:37, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- keep --MarSch 17:34, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. Delete, dictdef, and I don't think it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion - Google print turns up only two independent instances conveying meaning. Might be worth a transwiki anyway to let them figure it out, though. —Cryptic (talk) 12:13, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- This appears to be nothing to do with the "electrism" espoused by Viktor Schauberger, which is the only "electrism" that research turns up that isn't just one-person crank physics or that isn't simply synonymous with electricity (as is the case in the mainstream physics writings that I've found). A merger seems inappropriate, since the article content appears to be wrong. The few mainstream physics references that I can find give the term in contexts that imply that it was a 19th century term (with "magneticity" being an alternative name for "magnetism" and "electrism" being an alternative name for "electricity") contemporary with Michael Faraday, not a recent coinage, prior to the advent of the concept of electromagnetism. Redirect to electricity. Uncle G 15:13, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to electricity, per Uncle G. GreetingsEarthling 17:52, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect per Uncle G. Xoloz 12:14, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
