Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Kearns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edward Kearns

Edward Kearns (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No notability can be deduced from the article, no references are given (nor did I manage to find anything on the subject). —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Reads like a resume, feels a bit like COI. --Dennisthe2 02:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete A lot of little exploits, but nothing big enough to justify inclusion. YechielMan 02:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no assertion of notability. /Blaxthos 06:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N and WP:ATT and per nom. Orderinchaos78 15:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per the above. Kntrabssi 16:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

  Comment I deleted a paragraph per WP:LIBEL. No references are given, and it said that the subject attended a "School For Children With Dyslexia". The whole article was created by one user [1] and may well be an attack page. It should in my opinion be speedied. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

  I don't see anything in here that would indicate an attack page. Reading closely, there's possible WP:AUTO (or at least WP:COI), but no libel - and attending a school for dyslexic kids...well, ain't nothing wrong with that, especially if it's true. --Dennisthe2 23:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

  There's a lot wrong with including it without providing any sources, per WP:BLP. My attack page suspicion comes from the desperate attempts of an IP to delete the content/article [2]. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 00:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

  Ah, OK, noted there. --Dennisthe2 01:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.