Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edutain@grid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. At this time, this FP6 project does not meet Wikipedia's requirements. Serious conflict of interest issues also appear to be present. -Splash - tk 15:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edutain@grid

Edutain@grid (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable software, vanispamcruftisement. Contested prod. MER-C 09:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

• This page provides basic information on the FP6 project Edutain@grid. Any reference to software or companies, that could be considered to cause conflict of interest or notability issues, has been removed. The article has been shortened to provide a brief overview of the project. The entry was intended to emulate that of other, similar FP6 Projects - therefore it is difficult to understand why this page is marked for deletion, and how it differs from the others. Suggestions as to how to alter this entry to meet the requirements of Wikipedia editors would be much appreciated in order that this project can retain an entry similar to other FP6 projects.Edugrideditor 13:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

• Basically, what we need for now is non-trivial news coverage (not a press release) or another reliable secondary source. Abeg92contribs 18:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

• This is the link to the project page on the European Comission website CORDIS FP6: edutain@grid Is this a sufficient secondary source? Should it be added to the entry? Edugrideditor 07:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

• DELETE. No, the European Commission itself is not enough of a source. It appears that no one has written any newspaper or magazine articles on this entity, therefore it is unverifiable and probably unnotable. Herostratus 06:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.