Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educational Technologist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Redirected to Educational technology Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 09:03, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Educational Technologist

I know, I know - it sounds like it could be a real article. But it's three sentences of... unsalvagability. Herostratus 05:16, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom --Deville (Talk) 05:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Educational Technology. Sandstein 05:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Educational Technology. kotepho 07:33, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I've been WP:BOLD and redirected to Educational Technology. If you guys are happy with that I'll close the debate - otherwise just rv. Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 08:43, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Endorse the redirect. The topic of "-ogist" (beyond what is implied by "someone involved with "-ogy" ") could get encyclopedic expansion by experts familiar with current developments in the field, but until we have that, the redirection is better than a garbage-stub. Barno 14:55, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Educational Technology. --Terence Ong 16:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Educational Technologist is now a double redirect, it should be redirected to Educational technology not Educational Technology, but I don't how. Eivind 22:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Double-redirect fixed. Thanks for letting me know Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 22:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.