Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edem Afemeku
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 21:58Z
[edit] Edem Afemeku
Another hoax page from the folks at Princeton Day School that brought you Jake Felton (author). Not notable, likely more fiction/fanstasy Steve.Moulding 18:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is getting tiresome. Someone might want to file an abuse report. --Daniel J. Leivick 18:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's all true. Interview him if you don't believe it. Check the sources. Its all there. Eafemeku@pds.org —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nv1027 (talk • contribs).
- — Nv1027 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Its not notable. Period. Steve.Moulding 05:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- How is that? You are not God, you have no right to censor something that is not untrue. I don't care if you think that it isn't notable, but the people of Togo and the people of Princeton do think it is notable. I'm sorry for your Ignorance Mr. Moulding.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nv1027 (talk • contribs).
- — Nv1027 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Speedy delete Obvieosly a hoax, it even links to the PDS website! ffm yes? 19:48, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete junk, just like Jake Felton (author). JuJube 02:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable - he's a minor teacher, for goodness' sake ! And "walks like a spoof, quacks like a spoof...". WMMartin 21:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- For God's sake this man is an author. The information here is all true, and the fact that he has published work is testament to his notability. This article has no grounds for deletion (rereading it again, the World Cup business does sound a bit like a hoax, but aside from that, it seems reasonable enough). --GuidedByPavement 23:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- — GuidedByPavement (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- GuidedByPavement...if you remove the Articles for Deletion category again from Edem Afemeku you will be reported. It is generated automatically by the AfD process. Don't touch it. Steve.Moulding 23:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- That was my mistake, when I was formatting the sources I accidentally deleted the code for the articles removal and some of the heading. But my point still stands. The impartiality of this article can probably be disputed, but not notability. Probably needs better sources rather than that ask him for yourself crap.--GuidedByPavement 00:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
