Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Econoblog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deletoblog. - Mailer Diablo 14:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Econoblog

Econoblog (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

NN neologism. I'm not sure the world needs and accepts new names for each and every type of blog. These are simply blogs, but only differentiated by their subject matter. Ohconfucius 09:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. MER-C 09:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Deete per nom, useless neologism. SkierRMH,10:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I put up a proposal for deletion, which didn't go, so I didn't press the matter further. But I'm glad somebody's bringing it up now. Switchercat ^talk_cont 11:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. YAWN- Yet Another Web Neologism. Lurker ^oi! 11:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Deletoblog what Lurker said. Guy (Help!) 13:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Deletoblog per zat guy ^ (because I really like the word, and because "econoblog" is a non-notable term). -- Kicking222 15:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.