Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Brunswick, NJ Public Saftey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted as copyvio (CSD G12). -- Merope 08:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] East Brunswick, NJ Public Saftey

East Brunswick, NJ Public Saftey (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nom - Fails WP:N. Falls clearly under WP:NOT. Speedied once already. Rklawton 23:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

• Addendum - an anonymous user (User:69.248.74.237), presumably User:Cwk14724's IP due to his/her edit history, has removed the AfD tag from the nominated article as well as blanked this page. Rklawton 23:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, also, the way it is written, without any internal links, suggests a possible copyvio. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 00:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Copyvio - good call. Just about the whole article is a copyvio - pulled word from word from the eastbrunswick.org/publicsafety/ website. I've tagged it as a speedy copy-vio, so with luck, this AfD will become moot. Thanks for catching this. Rklawton 03:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. THis article was Speedy'd the first time it was made. If you examine my user talk, you'll see the author-editor claims to be operating with the knowledge and support of the mayor of East Brunswick. ThuranX 00:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Dhartung | Talk 00:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.