Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDSA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirected to Epifanio de los Santos Avenue, as it was in January. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUNETA (aeropagitica) 08:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] EDSA

Trademarked product name, no assertion of why it's notableNawlinWiki 11:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:SPAM WilyD 13:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete looks like an advertisement. The Epifanio de los Santos Avenue article should get a redirect from this page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zephyr2k (talk • contribs).
• Delete looks like an ad as well. --Palffy 14:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect In fact, the article actually was originally a redirect to Epifanio de los Santos Avenue; guess whoever wrote this article isn't Filipino, doesn't understand it's significance and/or just didn't care. But yes, the current article is definate spam; I'd recommend just reverting it back to being a redirect to the EDSA highway (being the only notable EDSA). –NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 00:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect - per NeoChaosX. Zaxem 05:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Purely an ad. Delete for that and the services section of WP:CORP. Kevin_b_er 08:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.