Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E$K

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete. per below.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 11:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] E$K

Vanity page - only contributor already removed two nominations for deletion Lars T. 16:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable/vanity --IslaySolomon 16:13, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Islay. Only local press does not meet notability standards. --DarkAudit 16:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NFT if not it certainly feels like one. Fiddle Faddle 16:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy A7 per nom. Only assertion of notability is of some minor trouble with the local police. Tevildo 18:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy, please!--Firsfron of Ronchester 22:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Deletion. CSD A7 (CSD G4?), non notable group. --blue520 10:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete (A7 and A4). Blue520 asked me to check if this was a repost since I deleted it before. Apart from the final two lines in the lead it is and those added lines are entirely unencyclopedic. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.