Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynasty rap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dynasty rap

Fails WP:VERIFY. A Google search shows no evidence of this existing. --Spring Rubber 05:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and also as a possible hoax (origins dating back to Jesus?) BigHaz 05:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator and User:BigHaz. JIP | Talk 06:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above, no sources provided in the article, leaving us to have to check Google, which mentions nothing relevant. -- H·G (^words/_works) 07:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for lot of evidence pointing to this being a hoax, and for a lack of Blake Carrington references. fuzzy510 07:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per all above. --BrownHairedGirl 08:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Yo! yo! yo! Blake Carrington in da house! --Xrblsnggt 02:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable, yo. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, and because Alexis "A Cizzle" Carrington would want it that way. GassyGuy 08:02, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Because despite the naming of the creditor it is still a feasible label for a new and upcoming genre of music. Medica 10:11, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as this is complete bollocks. --Wine Guy Talk 04:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.