The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 13:00, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Not notable. Vanity. -- Krash 19:16, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Agree this should be deleted. Not notable. Current information about the company is at www.dynamicfx.co.uk
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.