Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunn Consistency Model

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DS 20:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dunn Consistency Model

Delete: Unverifiable. Appears to be a hoax. Deprodded by an IP. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:58, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as nonsense. Maybe bordering on a G1 speedy candidate. --N Shar 04:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as patent nonsense (I just tagged it). The words are all real, but none of them add up to anything even remotely meaningful. Zetawoof^(ζ) 04:38, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Tag removed by admin as "doesn't meet any csd criteria". Go figure. Zetawoof^(ζ) 08:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Xe is correct. It doesn't. The article is comprehensible, and therefore it is not patent nonsense. Patent nonsense explicity does not include hoax articles, and hoax articles are not speedily deletable because it takes more than one pair of eyes to reliably identify hoaxes. That is what this article is: a hoax. Uncle G 10:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• I've been unable to confirm the existence of any such thing. That, and the article's self-contradiction, lead me to conclude that this is a hoax. Delete. Uncle G 10:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax QuiteUnusual 20:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax, per Uncle G.-- danntm ^T _C 02:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete, I hate hoaxes. NawlinWiki 02:43, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.