Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drug dynamization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, any possible merges are left as an editorial decision. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 10:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Drug dynamization

Drug dynamization (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

POV fork of a section of Homeopathy, though it might be an appropriate subject for an article if it wasn't a POV fork. Adam Cuerden ^talk 12:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

• I agree, but that's why I say weak keep in case the article can be salvaged. ObtuseAngle 17:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep per Talk:Homeopathy. Jim Butler^(talk) 22:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete POV fork, any remaining NPOV info can be merged into Homeopathy. Skinwalker 14:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep. The POV issue is probably (possibly?) correctible. I would suggest a selective merge to homeopathy, but that article is long and controversial enough. I've tagged this article for POV just in case. -- Black Falcon 01:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.