Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Yousef Haj-Ahmad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  23:26, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dr Yousef Haj-Ahmad

• Comment- I read this page and it appears to be a biography however vain it may seem it is based on factual information. I vote it stays.
• Comment- it seems like an informative essay, if it contains facts then it might as well stay.

I've read the article through, and I'm just not convinced of this guy's notability. The wanky effusive praise doesn't help either. Delete Reyk 05:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Comment- gone now. I assume it was a copyvio. Reyk 05:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Comment- well, I'm thoroughly confused and perplexed. How, when I use cut&paste, does an a change into an e? Reyk 05:27, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete probable WP:AUTO, actually, probably it's his child writing about their wonderful father. Still fails WP:N, but only because I doubt his company meets WP:CORP. Alba 05:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Dr. Yousef is truly a wonder! Who knows what opportunity he will pursue next? He surely is unstoppable! Self promotional drivel. Bobby1011 05:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Based on the material, the guy looks like a successful academic and scientist, but hardly notable enough to merit inclusion. It sure reads like vanity. Fan1967 05:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn, vanity. --Terence Ong 07:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Mr Ong. --kingboyk 07:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Any bio that begins with "a child was born" needs to go. I suspect it was copied from his own site, seems like the kind of thing people write about themselves. ProhibitOnions 11:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete What an odd article. — Adrian Lamo ·· 20:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. Man, that was surreal. Kuru ^talk 02:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. This article is very poorly written too. my goodness. Newyorktimescrossword 07:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 23:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.