Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dora Venter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was closed and relisted again. – Will (message me!) 15:28, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dora Venter
NN Porn actress, does not meet the requirements listed in WP:PORN Wildthing61476 14:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - This article pass WP:BIO and Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors) (she've performed in about 100 films). She is more notable from most of porn actress who have a Wikipedia article. 659,000 Google results [1] and 2,480 Google Image results [2]. --Haham hanuka 14:23, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - as Haham Banuka said but is stub is have to have more information --Jackys cy 14:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep and expand -Seidenstud 20:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete 83 films listed at IAFD does not meet WP:PORN BIO and there is no other claim to meeting WP:BIO's general criteria. Google tests are basically useless for porn subjects. Eluchil404 04:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment this AFD was "closed" by the creator of the article, who was also involved in edit warring around it, as "keep". I doubt whether this is allowed by Wikipedia policies. The creator is not an administrator (he failed the nomination 6 times) and is often banned from using Wikipedia. gidonb 12:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete does not meet the relevant treshold. gidonb 13:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment for the closing admin before closing the AfD, please note that the AfD appeared to be closed for part of the period since it was started by user:Wildthing61476 on July 7, 2006. gidonb 14:10, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
