Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doodoocaca
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Doodoocaca
Non-notable flash animation. Google search on terms "Doodoocaca Orilee" brings back only 77 unique on 1350 returns. No assertation of notability. Delete. MikeWazowski 17:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A7, tagged as such. Leibniz 17:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete NN. I previously closed this as A7, but have assented to its undeletion. Let's let the AfD run its course. I am relisting it to adjust for the time lost. - crz crztalk 04:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, - crz crztalk 04:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion. As the article's author, I thought I'd done sufficient research before adding the entry. If it's really NN, so be it. I thought it had sufficient notable hits to warrant an article. - Lucky 6.9 04:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. MER-C 05:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Notability not demonstrated --Cynicism addict 05:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete — A random Flash cartoon with no assertion of notability - seems like a fan wrote this. –- kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 06:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as above. wikipediatrix 22:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment How exactly did the undeletion conform to Wikipedia:Undeletion policy? Leibniz 23:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'd undeleted it out of anger and Crzrussian felt it best to let the AfD run its full course. Seems pretty unanimous at this point. - Lucky 6.9 00:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
