Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domeshot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Domeshot

This is a non-notable neologism if not a hoax. The article cites only urbandictionary.com as a source. This is not a proper source because the entire point of that site is that anyone can submit a definition. In addition, the only Google hits for the term and "oral sex" come from that site [1]. Deprodded. Erechtheus 15:35, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I tried checking and got the same results. Article looks more like vanity for the alleged coiners of the alleged word. Fiddle Faddle 15:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. eaolson 15:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO or WP:HOAX (if it is a hoax). --Nishkid64 18:41, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism, UD is not a reliable source, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:59, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 23:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.