Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney formula

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 00:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Disney formula

Delete. Pure opinion and fluff. Unencyclopedic "rules" for Disney movies. Even states that the rules don't work for all movies. -- Wikipedical 03:22, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Sounds like original research to me, total nonsense --lightdarkness ^(talk) 03:34, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete looks to be original research. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 03:49, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, original research. moink 04:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete, with some reluctance. If this were made by a user with a user name, I'd choose userfy instead. Disney animated movies are indeed formulaic. I believe sources could be found for most of this analysis, and parts of the text could be profitably incorporated elsewhere. Smerdis of Tlön 04:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. --FuriousFreddy 07:31, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete as original research, but I also feel that it has some merit for inclusion elsewhere (off Wikimedia sites). -- Mithent 14:56, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Cleanup and rename to List of Disney animated movie clichés (we have List of movie cliches, List of action movie cliches and list of horror movie cliches), otherwise delete. Daniel Case 15:00, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Cleanup/rename else Delete as per Daniel Case. -- Mithent 15:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: It needs extensive cleanup if it is to be kept. Most of it is made up of opinions and half-truths. --FuriousFreddy 20:51, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete original "research" Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 21:40, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as OR. Blnguyen 04:01, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this is a list of criteria with Disney movies that fit a mold contasted with those that don't. Not encyclopedic. Carlossuarez46 22:59, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as OR. A List of Disney animated movie clichés might be interesting as long as it listed outside sources, otherwise more OR. Cleanup and rename looks like a Herculean task. Good luck if you want to try it. Thatcher131 23:07, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The article is on to something, but it is original research that is not presented with any sort of neutrality. Nor does it have all that much encyclopedic value; I don't think people over the age of 10 need an encyclopedia to tell them that Disney movies are formulaic and contrived. Please Don't BlockPlease Don't Block
• Delete along the lines of Thatcher131's thinking Ruby 02:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Article has been altered to better meet Wikipedia standards. Please reconsider.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.