Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discover, disciminate, distill, and disseminate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discover, disciminate, distill, and disseminate

• citation added. what else do you want me to do? Robert Steele 17:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Essay, not noteworthy, not encyclopedic. Nomination related to Open source intelligence; cf its AfD page --Ori Livneh (talk..contribs) 17:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Discover, discriminate, distill, disseminate and Delete ~ trialsanderrors 17:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• I was responding to the request for citation in the origin wikipedia entry. Although my work has been central to the development of OSINT I am trying very hard to avoid citing myself. Also the way the US Institute of Peace posted the piece, there is no easy way to link to the specific page, and rather than expecting people to look over the whole page (remember, someone else asked me to provide the citation), I thought that extracting it and then linking was the way to go. This was a way to illiminate and cite with a link to the US Institute of Peace. IMHO, it is both worthy of distinction and part of the emerging encyclopedic knowledge, but I am new to this, trying to fit in with the culture. I expect to learn more in Boston. Recommend retention. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Robert Steele (talk • contribs).
  • Comment Google provides only 2 hits, even with the correct spelling. Care to provide reliable sources for its established use? ~ trialsanderrors 18:00, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless sources are provided to prove its notability, veracity, etc. HumbleGod 19:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research / protologism by Mr. Steele; this phrase has all of two Google hits, and the source that is cited is by Mr. Steele himself. Mr. Steele, we value your contributions, but please do read our policies: WP:NOT, WP:NOR, WP:V. Sandstein 21:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - please! I can understand I may have made a mistake with submitting Open source intelligence to AFD, but really, this article is going too far. - Ta bu shi da yu 14:35, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Rebecca 12:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.