Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirty underwear fetish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dirty underwear fetish

Dirty underwear fetish (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Original research, unverifiable, probable hoax/joke article. Slig303 17:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

• delete - I am not suprised that this is a fetish, but it definitely does not need its own unsourced article. -- Diletante 17:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for failure to satisfy WP:ATT. Nonnotable sex fetish, one of a infinite number of such. Edison 19:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - I'm surprised this wasn't speedy deleted, especially given the edit history of the new account which created this. - Quietvoice 19:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. For heaven's sake! - Iridescenti (talk to me!) 19:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to panty fetishism. -- Dhartung | Talk 20:08, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• delete as a probable hoax and unverifiable regardless. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 20:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• delete I agree with Niffweed. probably a hoax April_I_R_Fooled 20:51, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, This is systematic bias again! Dirty underwear fetish is massive in Germany and the low countries. And if it wasn't for DUF (as it is known), there would be no sex at all in Siberia. David Spart (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) 21:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete with no redirect per wp not a page for some crap you just thought up. meshach 22:00, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable, probable hoax, unverifiable, no reliable sources cited - take your pick. --sunstar net^talk 00:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
• Deletehoax --The Phoenix Enforcer 01:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

  Erm... - hoe can this be a hoax if there are so many results? [1]? Can someone translate this into German, then we can see how popular this fetish is. David Spart (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) 01:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete as WP:OR then, just so long as it's deleted! - Iridescenti (talk to me!) 01:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Did I understand that last exchange correctly? Delete under any rule, appropriate or not, as long as it gets deleted? DGG 05:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't like the sound of that. How about delete per WP:IDONTLIKEIT? —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 06:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. This article isn't well-developed, but I don't doubt that this fetish exists given the billion or so google hits. So, I recommend that the article author look for published work that discusses this fetish. Breast expansion fetish went through a similar deletion discussion, and several reliable sources were found. Consider writing the article in a user subpage until it is ready. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 06:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

I will of course try, but I certainly never expected to be the local expert on documenting parasexual fetishes and related subjects--I really do not have any specialist qualifications. Help for this would really be appreciated, because I expect some of this will be video and other material I can not easily work with. (smile) It will be easy enough to recreate if I cant do it with the time span needed. DGG 06:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

The article as it currently exists is really no loss if it's deleted, so feel free to take your time. I was mainly saying that to the creator of the article, who (I now see) doesn't happen to be participating in this discussion. As long as the article isn't salted, I'll be happy. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 07:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

• Merge to Fetish for now; once we have enough material for this to break into its own article we can revisit. Vectro 16:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.