Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dingo Jellybean

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 23:24, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dingo Jellybean

This article has been tagged for speedy deletion a long time now, and I think that's because I am not the only administrator loathe to delete this as a vanity article not asserting notability. The authorship of a number of game FAQs is the assertion of notability, but that does not seem to be notable enough to me. I will vote delete but I think some backing on VFD might be in order. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:55, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

• Really, this is a valid speedy. Writing some game FAQ's is about the lamest claim of notability I've seen. The rest of the article is vanity extraordinaire. -R. fiend 15:19, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete the assertion of notability is pretty lame, but it claims some degree of notability in a limited but distinct community. Very marginal either way for WP:CSD A7 I think. DES 15:44, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable, vanity. Quale 20:20, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• The name's familiar...but that's just 'cuz he's a prominent member of a board on which I used to post. Delete usercruft. -- Grev -- Talk 02:50, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.