Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinergy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, paleoneologism. --- Deville (Talk) 03:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dinergy

Completely idiosyncratic non-topic Dicklyon 06:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

• This one's hard. Weak keep for now, because of the sources and number of Ghits (3,750 [1]). Perhaps this could be merged somewhere?--Cúchullain ^t/c 04:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete zero hits on JSROR, one hit on ScienceDirect: the original article by György Doczi from 1986. That article gets all of 1 citation on ISI citation search, and Doczi overall gets about 30. Paleoneologism that never took off. After delete redirect to Dynegy, which is what most of the Google hits bring up. ~ trialsanderrors 03:05, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.