Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Designs in Machine Embroidery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 03:57, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Designs in Machine Embroidery

Adcopy. 202.156.6.59 20:08, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

• Weak Delete Keep... maybe it's just the fact that this magazine actually exists. I would have sworn it was a hoax. If someone replaced the current adcruft with an article, I could be convinced to go keep.--Isotope23 20:45, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment I have removed the most gratuitous excesses of advertising, but as a consequence there isn't much of an article left. Mallocks 22:26, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Legitimate magazine, though I don't know the circulation rate. The editor is fairly well known in "machine embroidery" circles. 68.20.28.234 03:34, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
  • • There are "machine embroidery" circles? Changing vote based on Mallocks edit.--Isotope23 15:00, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Wearables though - is that clothing - would a woolly hat be clothing or a wearable? : ) Alf ^melmac 10:26, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.