Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dedication C.C

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy A7 by Chairboy. Tevildo 15:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dedication C.C

Dedication C.C (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This is a hoax article and is pure invention, probably by schoolboys; it completely fails all WP tests of notability BlackJack | ^{talk page} 22:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletions. -- Tubezone 02:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --BlackJack | ^{talk page} 22:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete There's no serious assertion of notability, nor any references, even if it's true, it was an informal one-shot team. Don't understand why speedy tag was pulled on this, except admins are loath to pull the delete trigger on anything tagged as a hoax. Tubezone 22:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

It seems to be only a little bit of fun mate, with these boys only looking for a laugh. It seems the tournament runs until 30th December so it may be deleted after that....Are you the WP master or someone fed up with the admins? Get over it!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Del horno15 (talk • contribs).

• Strong Delete or even Speedy Delete per comment right above. Also, this team doesn't meet any notability criteria. Might meet WP:HOAX or WP:NFT though.--Húsönd 00:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

• Comment If Wikipedia adopted a Limbo namespace, this article could be moved to Limbo during the discussion on deletion. Moving an article to Limbo would remove it from the article namespace and prevent search engines from delivering suspicious content while the community decides whether to keep or delete it. For more information, see the discussion on establishing the Limbo namespace. Fg2 01:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.