Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Lynne McCabe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-03 07:45Z
[edit] Debra Lynne McCabe
Doesn't seem to be that notable of an actress. Is only one sentence long and is missing important information. CyberGhostface 00:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Being a stub is not a valid reason to delete an article. --Eastmain 00:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nor was that my main reason. But so far her biggest role is hanging naked for five minutes in a horror film. She's not that notable.--CyberGhostface 00:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Further Comment I agree "doesn't seem to be notable" and stub aren't valid reasons for deletion. --Kevin Murray 01:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- So do you support its deletion or not?--CyberGhostface 02:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to Saw III until someone is willing to write a real article about her. Carolfrog 02:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect as per Carolfrog. Noted that this is the only article that this user has created. Hotmann 05:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:BIO at this time. While I don't object to a redirect per se, it isn't clear to me what we gain from one in this case, and it seems like an unlikely search term. JoshuaZ 06:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per JoshuaZ --Webkami 16:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and do not redirect. She doesn't pass WP:BIO, and redirecting would just confuse the reader as to why they landed at the article about the movie. -- Whpq 17:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and do not redirect. Subject fails WP:BIO, and a redirect from an actor to a movie doesn't make much sense.-- danntm T C 20:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as insufficiently referenced There's a difference between being a stub and not having enough references to demonstrate notability. The only reference in the article is he IMDB listing, but as per the WP:BIO guideline the person should be the subject of multiple, independently published articles/interviews. Delete for now, and possibly recreate if and when those sort of references can be provided. Dugwiki 22:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
