Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death note

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to Death Note. Physchim62 17:29, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Death note

This should be deleted, or at the very least, redirected to Death Note. I'd bet every penny I've earned that this was created only to add further attention to the Death Note LiveJournal community debacle. cma 02:34, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect → Death note; {{R from other capitalisation}} --Mysidia (talk) 02:50, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirct per above. Image:Smilie.gifMolotov Image:Caranimationforvmolotov.gif (talk) e
  03:43, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Another example of the stuff that will be WP's undoing. delete it. and how!--Gaff ^{talk 10:32, 15 October 2005 (UTC)}

• How about a redirect to Death certificate. Lets deal with real things on WP. Not abstract who-haw.--Gaff ^{talk 10:34, 15 October 2005 (UTC)}

• Redirect to Death Note. Gaff, manga are "real things", even though all of the article except its lead deals with the fictional aspect. See also User:Uncle G/Describe this universe. Have you ever actually heard of a death certificate being described as a "death note"? —Cryptic (talk) 11:30, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

• Not in the hospital I work at. I'll withdraw my vote to delete and let it get redirected wherever.--Gaff ^{talk 08:45, 16 October 2005 (UTC)}

• Redirect to Death Note. --Optichan 16:36, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per nom. Jesse 19:13, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as there is already a perfectly acceptable article located at Death Note. cma 01:31, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Rogerd 03:32, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per Mysidia et al. --168.12.253.82 14:43, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Death Note, which is a far better article anyway. - Sensor 02:29, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.