Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Naugle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, publishing real book with awards meets at least the minimum bar of WP:BIO --- Deville (Talk) 03:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] David Naugle

Fails WP:BIO. Author of a book and claims a PhD, no different than any other college professor. Has no sources or notablity. Arbusto 05:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and continue expansion. Notable. --Use Your Naugin 09:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: User's first ever edit was on the Naugle today. The first time anyone has expanded it in four years. Still asserts no notablity. Classic Jason Gastrich (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log), a banned user. Arbusto 16:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete As non-notable. JoshuaZ 17:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Looking over his CV [1] I find it odd that he was a minister for 8 years then suddenly became a professor in 1987 and got a Th.D the same year. Then earned a PhD in 1998, 8 years after he became the chair of a department at Dallas Baptist University. Arbusto 17:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. Nickieee 19:48, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unsourced and hagiographic in tone, no credible evidence of encyclopaedic notability. Guy 08:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep published authors from non-vanity house, had a book of the week review with Christianity Today s well. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Badlydrawnjeff, non vanity press author with published reviews. RFerreira 18:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep published author of award winning book. I've cleaned up the book and award reference in the article. Agne 20:06, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.