Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Mclagan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 07:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] David Mclagan

Was marked for Wikipedia:Proposed deletion, but the tag was removed by a user who appeared to suggest that being an Royal Academy member makes one notable. Is that so? Sandstein 22:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Delete. Being a member of the Royal Academy doesn't mean you get too many relevant results in the Google test. Seems non-notable to me. --Kinu 23:06, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. According the the Royal Academy website, "At any one time there are no more than 80 Royal Academicians, all eminent practising artists". This might qualify one for notability. HOWEVER, David McIagan is NOT listed on as a member of the Royal Academy. The rest of the claims in the article are not notable. —ERcheck @ 23:59, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. And I don't want to know what Inflatable Creative produces - I just hope his namesake, the Rev David McLagan of East Kilbride, would approve. Dlyons493 Talk 00:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, borderline speedy as {{nn-bio}}. Stifle 00:09, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and I think it is {{nn-bio}} James084 01:32, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.