Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David J James

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 06:39, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] David J James

Not quite sure this lives up to Wikipedia:Importance so I'm putting it up on VfD. Do principals of schools deserve their own articles? The only thing that makes him distince is an he is an Officer of the British Empire (but lot's of people have those, about 858 per year actually). I remain neutral.Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 22:33, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep all principals if we're gong to keep all schools. RickK 04:36, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment I didn't know we are keeping all schools. It can seem like that, but it is not the concensus or fact. Vegaswikian 06:12, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • It's not the consensus, but it certainly is the fact. The inclusionists brag about it every chance they get -- "x number of schools pages have been kept, 0 pages have been deleted." RickK 07:07, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 05:01, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn Vegaswikian 06:12, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Gamaliel 07:10, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn.  Grue  15:08, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn. carmeld1 01:11, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.