Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ivermee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 01:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] David Ivermee

Delete as non-notable. Although what is claimed in relation to Make Poverty History is true (see [1]), nothing in the article seems to me to meet the requirements of WP:BIO. htonl 21:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom (clearly non-notable vanity page). Joe 21:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. With this threshhold for notability, there'll be another 5 billion to come.... Slowmover 21:57, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable. Chairman S. ^Talk 22:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Why is this page not tagged {{nn-bio}}? An unremarkable report of the life of an A-level candidate schoolboy, WP:BIO refers.  (aeropagitica)  22:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete obvious {{db-bio}}. Gwernol 22:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

This article is a biographical account of the life of a talented and well-known if young, individual who is sure to become a leading figure in Politics in years to come. Removing this article will only mean someone having to submit another in the future.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Billy Beaumont (talk • contribs).

You are free to recreate the article after he has done something notable. There are tens of millions of promising young people who haven't done anything notable yet. This is one of them. Fan1967 23:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete Yet another of the infinite number of schoolkid vanity pages we get all the time. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:27, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.