Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Gabrielle Martyn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:54, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] David Gabrielle Martyn

No relevant or noteworthy information has been provided in the article (including the cruft I've reverted out multiple times); no apparent claim to notability. --Emufarmers^(T/C) 13:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete, this is complete nonsense -- Deville (Talk) 16:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:V WilyD 16:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy to User:Dmartyn and delete. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:VAIN, WP:NN, WP:AUTO. Trivial, unsourced article about non-notable person. 2Ghits, bith from Wiki Ohconfucius 02:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Do Not Delete is there a reason words like wikify and userfy can be thrown around willie nillie, but an article like this can be considered nonsense? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DMartyn (talk • contribs).

• Do not Delete I'm not sure I want to visit a website that has some sort of filter on information. In fact, JZ Knight may be possibly holding an investigation on the conduct of wikipedia. David Gabrielle Martyn's article was continuously vandalized. Furthermore, the entry was subjected to the much dreaded "WIKIFY", "USERFY", "COHERENTFY" tags that detract readers from the article. Finally, it should noted that Emufarmers continuously emailed me, throughout this argument, asking for my sign, A/S/L, postal code and unwashed briefs. CDiPoce 06:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:BIO, bordering on nonsense. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 07:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Wiktionary defines pretension with the example of Wikipedia having a page on itself, and questioning the notability of others.--Dmartyn 05:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.