Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darwinian Fundamentalism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Adaptationism. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-05 09:57Z

[edit] Darwinian Fundamentalism

Darwinian Fundamentalism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

It's an article on a book review by Stephen Jay Gould. While the review itself might make a good example for an article on the famous battle between Gould and Dawkins, I don't think there's much reason to keep this article. Adam Cuerden ^talk 08:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• Incomplete nomination by Adam Cuerden. No stance at this time -- saberwyn 08:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I was in the process of writing it up when you replied. Adam Cuerden ^talk 08:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• Two different topics presented. I suggest merge the first into Adaptationism or some other existing article per nominator, and delete the creationist paragraph. The only source for the latter is an on-line article in forbes.com which accuses "Darwinianists" of being "the most objectionable fundamentalists in the world today", but does not ever put the words "Darwinian Fundamen*" together in that order. I suggest against redirecting due to ambiguity as to which sense the phrase might be intended to mean, Gouldian or Creationist. Pete.Hurd 15:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 18:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge per above. Nomen Nescio^{Gnothi seauton} 18:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into Adaptationism. CenozoicEra 07:02, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.