Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Deeds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:40, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dark Deeds

No assertion of notability for a fan-made Warcraft map. WP:WEB not met. Wikipedia is not a game guide. "Dark Deeds" warcraft -wikipedia gets only 274 unique Ghits. -- Scientizzle 17:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[Dark Deeds Warcraft] gets 153,000 hits and the 2nd top result is the wikipedia page. Also there are several other warcraft 3 custom maps on wikipedia and a category which Dark Deeds is listed under. See Category:Warcraft custom games -- ToastTheif 6:50pm, 25 September 2006 (EST)

• Delete per nom. Let some gaming wiki have it. —dustmite 23:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep As ToastTheif mentioned, other Warcraft III custom maps are being kept on the site. While I agree that this article is not notable (like every other), it seems as though it isn't quite fair that they haven't all been deleted (as they all should be, or none should be)--BGBkstroke 01:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Wait...you're admiting that the article is "not notable," but you're voting keep because other articles haven't yet been deleted? And you basically argued the same thing on the AfDs for "other Warcraft III custom maps," Eve of the Apocalypse & Footmen Wars. (This strikes me as a ridiculous contradiction to your own argument: don't delete this article becuase other Warcraft III custom map articles exist, then you vote to keep the other articles, too?!) The discussion here is about Dark Deeds, and Dark Deeds should be considered in its merits alone. There is no "fairness" involving Wikipedia articles--a subject either merits an article, according to Wikipedia policies & guidelines, or does not. If other Warcraft III custom maps have articles, they are to be considered on their merits. -- Scientizzle 02:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a non-notable map in a game. If the map were used in a major tournament that might (maybe) constitute a weak claim of notability but this doesn't even have that. (and Scientizzle I don't think you mean to link to tautology there)JoshuaZ 03:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • You're right... -- Scientizzle 03:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete nothing but gameguide/stats info in this article. There is absolutely no claim to notability, and it is quite disturbing that there are links to images of gameguide information someone uploaded on imageshack.us. Altair 14:58, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of Warcraft deletions. Altair 15:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Altair 15:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails WP:RS, WP:V, WP:NOT (a gameguide that is). Wickethewok 15:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Wickethewok. I might understand if the article made at least a token claim of notability, but otherwise there's no reason to keep the article. --Alan Au 20:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete - As per previous posters. The Kinslayer 09:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.